Instant Workups

Book Review: Symptom Based Radiology by Donald L. Renfrew MD (2011)

Choosing the wrong imaging study leads to unnecessary costs, complications, and side effects (no citation needed!). Yet many seasoned clinicians sometimes have trouble with knowing what imaging study to order.

I  think the author was correct in stating:

“I wrote Symptom Based Radiology to help primary care providers make better use of radiology services. The audience includes internists practicing general medicine, family medicine physicians, emergency room physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and specialists working outside their usual area of expertise. As a general radiologist, I have fielded thousands of phone calls asking which radiology study to order, and it seems that many times, despite good training and extensive experience, primary care providers need help in making this decision. More than 99% of existing radiology textbooks describe how to interpret imaging studies with little advice on what study to order. This book provides that advice….”

Donald L. Renfrew MD, Symptom Based Radiology (Preface)

Here are some “best test” recommendations from the book (from easy to not so easy…). Please note how subtle changes in the scenario can dramatically change the workup:

  • sudden onset of isolated facial paralysis of upper and lower portions of face: usually no imaging (Bell’s palsy).
  • facial paralysis with other deficits and/or with sparing of upper face: brain MRI.
  • subjective tinnitus: no imaging study is necessary unless the pattern and demographics is suspicious for multiple sclerosis.
  • objective (auscultated by examiner) tinnitus: Brain MRI plus MRA or CTA of skull base and neck vessels.
  • isolated conductive hearing loss:  no imaging if the history supports an obvious diagnosis such as cholesteatoma, otosclerosis. If cause is not clear, then order CT of temporal bones
  • isolated sensorineural hearing loss:  brain MRI without and with contrast (to rule out vestibular schwannoma).
  • palpable thyroid lesion:  fine needle aspiration (FNA).
  • non-thyroid neck mass of unknown origin: neck CT  with contrast plus (in a smoker) CT of chest with contrast plus referral to otolaryngology for biopsy and/or triple endoscopy (laryngoscopy, esophagoscopy and bronchoscopy).

I read this book for the same reason I read Cope’s Early Diagnosis of the Acute Abdomen: I wanted to know what a specialist with twenty-five years of experience (or more) would do. I therefore find the very extensive use of UpToDate as a reference source to be a bit of a distraction. I would be very interested in seeing an updated edition of Symptom Based Radiology with more references to primary sources in radiology literature. One of the best ways to learn how people think is to become familiar with what they read.

The book is very useful to anyone who takes doctoring seriously, including medical students, residents, fellows and attendings and is included in Radiology: A Curriculum for Self-Guided Learners. It contains a wealth of essential but hard-to-find guidance for clinical practice and for preparation for medical licensing examination. It is the leading book in its genre and an important and unique contribution to the world of medical publishing. I recommend it highly.
Sample chapter here (.PDF)

Comments

7 responses to “Book Review: Symptom Based Radiology by Donald L. Renfrew MD (2011)”

  1. Sonya D Avatar
    Sonya D

    Interesting book review. Definitely makes me want to go out and get this.

    1. Mark Yoffe MD Avatar
      Mark Yoffe MD

      Thank you for your comment, Dr. Sonya.

      FYI – Dr. Renfrew also has a very nice website with sample material from the book and other educational material at .

  2. Brian Avatar
    Brian

    This is similar to the American College of Radiology’s Appropriateness Criteria.(http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Appropriateness-Criteria).

    1. Mark Yoffe MD Avatar
      Mark Yoffe MD

      Thank you Dr. Brian for your comment and link. There seems to be a lot of useful material there.

      I wonder though about potential for conflict of interest, with a radiology group recommending all those imaging studies….

      1. Sonya D Avatar
        Sonya D

        It’s true that radiologists are always interested in more radiology. I have always wanted to do a study looking at how often doctors ordered the follow-up tests recommended by radiologists in their reports and what the clinical outcomes were, as compared to patients for whom radiology did not recommend additional testing.

  3. princes c.c.nnadi Avatar
    princes c.c.nnadi

    can a student radiographer make use of the textbook as well?

    1. Mark Yoffe MD Avatar
      Mark Yoffe MD

      Thank you for your comment, Princes.

      I don’t have experience with educating radiography students. I would nonetheless guess that this book might be advanced for many.

      You might want to look at Comprehensive Radiographic Pathology, which is an excellent book that I reviewed elsewhere. ). That book was specifically written for radiography students.

      Good luck!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *